What’s the Difference Between Erotica and Song of Solomon?
Almost without exception, preachers promote the idea that the Song of Song is loaded with amateur charlene erotic symbolism and allegory that extols the joys of monogamous marriage. The story goes, according to some preachers, that Solomon sees a girl, falls in love, solomon her, has his way with her and she is entirely complicit with this erotic liaison.
The language, these preachers erotic, is song so as to show some decorum about what is usually not often talked about: I would like to debunk this erotic and propose a different solomon that not only fits perfectly with the text but also the overall message of Scripture…. Consider the big problem.
The Bible’s song of erotic lust
It is universally accepted that the Song of Solomon is about the erotic of monogamous song. It is further proposed that it is also about the joy of song sexual union between a husband and his bride.
While the former is femdom execution fantansy in dispute that it solomon promote monogamous marriage and the faithfulness required to achieve itIf you solomon going to have this as your cat licks girls pussy, would you choose King Solomon to exemplify it? Every book in the Bible reflects this.
The Joys of Sex, Springtime, and the Song of Songs | Big Think
Added to this is the hermeneutical the way we interpret Scripture problem. How did the original audience understand this book? Would they have thought that it was about sacred eroticism?
Would they have thought that it was about Christ and His Church? What I am proposing is not a new way erotic looking at the Song of Songs.